| Treasury Control and Public Expenditure in Scotland 1885-1979 Contributor(s): Levitt, Ian (Editor) |
|
 |
ISBN: 0197265790 ISBN-13: 9780197265796 Publisher: British Academy OUR PRICE: $94.05 Product Type: Hardcover Published: November 2014 |
| Additional Information |
| BISAC Categories: - Business & Economics | Public Finance - History | Europe - General - History | Modern - 20th Century |
| Dewey: 336.390 |
| LCCN: 2014497015 |
| Series: Records of Social & Economic History |
| Physical Information: 1.3" H x 6.2" W x 9.2" (1.45 lbs) 300 pages |
| Themes: - Chronological Period - 20th Century |
| Descriptions, Reviews, Etc. |
| Publisher Description: The book sets out to establish the Treasury view of Scottish claims for public expenditure from the establishment of the Scottish Office in 1885 to the failed referendum on political devolution in 1979. Drawn largely from previously unresearched (and partly uncatalogued) Treasury documents held at The National Archives (UK) it provides a unique appreciation whether its ministers and officials viewed public investment north of the border as economically 'productive', designed to ensure equivalence in public investment between Scotland and England, or otherwise to placate Scottish interests. The book begins with a selection of documents drawn from the period between 1885 and 1914: a time of limited government, but which saw consistent Scottish claims for additional expenditure to alleviate Highland distress, to support Scottish fisheries, and fund an expansion of its four ancient universities, as well as securing a formula that ensured equivalence in educational expenditure. It then reproduces documents covering the inter-war years when government policy aspired to reconcile demands for collective provision with its belief in a free market. It locates Scottish claims within the Treasury's desire to secure an appropriate balance between English and Scottish public expenditure. Finally, the book draws on documents from 1940 until 1979, when the primary goal of government was to manage collective provision within a mixed economy. In doing so it illustrates Treasury concerns on the directions of the Scottish economy, and on seeking more devolved responsibility for the choices on investment that Scottish ministers sought. Throughout it considers the changes in the Treasury's administrative structure as it impacted on Scottish claims. |