Limit this search to....

An Essay on Man. Moral Essays and Satires
Contributor(s): Morley, Henry (Editor), Pope, Alexander (Author)
ISBN: 197577468X     ISBN-13: 9781975774684
Publisher: Createspace Independent Publishing Platform
OUR PRICE:   $13.30  
Product Type: Paperback - Other Formats
Published: August 2017
Qty:
Additional Information
BISAC Categories:
- Literary Collections
- History | Europe - General
- Poetry
Physical Information: 0.39" H x 5.98" W x 9.02" (0.56 lbs) 184 pages
 
Descriptions, Reviews, Etc.
Publisher Description:
An Essay on Man is a poem published by Alexander Pope in 1734. It is a rationalistic effort to use philosophy in order to "vindicate the ways of God to man" (l.16), a variation of John Milton's claim in the opening lines of Paradise Lost, that he will "justify the ways of God to men" (1.26). It is concerned with the natural order God has decreed for man. Because man cannot know God's purposes, he cannot complain about his position in the Great Chain of Being (ll.33-34) and must accept that "Whatever IS, is RIGHT" (l.292), a theme that was satirized by Voltaire in Candide (1759). More than any other work, it popularized optimistic philosophy throughout England and the rest of Europe. Pope's Essay on Man and Moral Epistles were designed to be the parts of a system of ethics which he wanted to express in poetry. Moral Epistles have been known under various other names including Ethic Epistles and Moral Essays. On its publication, An Essay on Man met with great admiration throughout Europe. Voltaire called it "the most beautiful, the most useful, the most sublime didactic poem ever written in any language". citation needed] In 1756 Rousseau wrote to Voltaire admiring the poem and saying that it "softens my ills and brings me patience". Kant was fond of the poem and would recite long passages of the poem to his students. Later however, Voltaire renounced his admiration for Pope and Leibniz's optimism and even wrote a novel, Candide, as a satire on Pope and Leibniz's philosophy of ethics. Rousseau also critiqued the work. He questioned "Pope's uncritical assumption that there must be an unbroken chain of being all the way from inanimate matter up to God.