Limit this search to....

Evidence for Vascular or Endovascular Reconstruction
Contributor(s): Greenhalgh, Roger M. (Author), Becquemin, Jean-Pierre (Author), Davies, Alun (Author)
ISBN: 0702026751     ISBN-13: 9780702026751
Publisher: Bailliere Tindall
OUR PRICE:   $266.31  
Product Type: Hardcover
Published: May 2002
Qty:
Temporarily out of stock - Will ship within 2 to 5 weeks
Annotation: This unique resource provides a comprehensive "head-to-head" forum for the debate into open versus endoluminal vascular treatment. Controversial treatment options are supported by evidence, in which the pros and cons are both explored and analyzed by an international panel of experts and their contributors, widely recognised as the leading authorities in the field. It is a one-stop reference for both the trainee vascular surgeon and the vascular consultant who requires a comprehensive view into the various management options as well as the evidence supporting the more difficult vascular procedures.
Additional Information
BISAC Categories:
- Medical | Surgery - Vascular
- Medical | Cardiology
Dewey: 617.413
Physical Information: 1.07" H x 6.62" W x 10.06" (2.20 lbs) 456 pages
 
Descriptions, Reviews, Etc.
Publisher Description:
This unique resource provides a comprehensive head-to-head forum for the debate into open versus endoluminal vascular treatment. Controversial treatment options are supported by evidence, in which the pros and cons are both explored and analyzed by an international panel of experts and their contributors, widely recognised as the leading authorities in the field. It is a one-stop reference for both the trainee vascular surgeon and the vascular consultant who requires a comprehensive view into the various management options as well as the evidence supporting the more difficult vascular procedures.
  • offers a one-stop-shop for the current debate for and against open versus endoluminal treatment.
  • uses an evidence-based approach to the controversial areas of vascular surgery.
  • provides an authoritative source of outcomes for various operations based on fact not opinion.
  • serves as a practical reference of recommended techniques debated by expert arguments for and against them.