| Legislative Scrutiny: Transparency of Lobbying, Non-Party Campaigning and Trade Union Administration Bill: House of Lords Paper 61 Session 2013-14 Contributor(s): The Stationery Office (Editor) |
|
 |
ISBN: 0108551385 ISBN-13: 9780108551383 Publisher: Stationery Office Books (TSO) OUR PRICE: $28.50 Product Type: Paperback Published: October 2013 |
| Additional Information |
| BISAC Categories: - Law | Administrative Law & Regulatory Practice - Business & Economics | Business Communication - General |
| Physical Information: 54 pages |
| Descriptions, Reviews, Etc. |
| Publisher Description: While it accepts that there may be a pressing need to reform non-party campaigning, the Joint Committee on Human Rights calls on the Government to pause the passage of the Transparency of Lobbying, Non-party Campaigning and Trade Union Administration Bill to allow for further scrutiny and for further consultation with the Electoral Commission, the Commission on Civil Society and Democratic Engagement and relevant stakeholders. There should in particular be more careful consideration of the potential impact on campaigners' rights to free speech and freedom of association.The Committee welcomes the Government improvements made to Part 2 during its passage though the Commons but remains concerned about the following issues in this Part of the Bill: the lack of clarity about the practical effects of the provision in this Part of the Bill which has led to widespread concern that third parties may be dissuaded from participating in campaigns with a potential chilling effect on free speech; the increased list of regulated activities, combined with the reduction in maximum spending and lowered registration thresholds, which has created concerns that legitimate campaigning activities could be inhibited; the failure of the Government to explain satisfactorily the rationale for the new maximum spending limits and registration threshold in light of the increased number of regulated activities; and the need for greater consideration as to whether these reforms are proportionate. |
