| Preservation Versus the People: Nature, Humanity, and Political Philosophy Contributor(s): Humphrey, Mathew (Author) |
|
 |
ISBN: 0199242674 ISBN-13: 9780199242672 Publisher: Oxford University Press, USA OUR PRICE: $66.50 Product Type: Hardcover - Other Formats Published: October 2002 Annotation: Why should any society take the decision to devote scarce resources, as a matter of public policy, to preserving natural objects? This is one of the questions considered in the field of environmental ethics, and the thinking that has taken place in this discipline has been dominated by the 'ecocentric-anthropocentric' distinction. Answers focus on either 'intrinsic values in nature', or on the human welfare benefits that will accrue from preservationist policies. These two answers are generally taken to be both mutually exclusive and collectively exhaustive. Ecocentric writers believe that their preferred environmental ethic transcends anthropocentrism, whilst those who cleave to a more 'ecological humanist' position, view the turn to ecocentrism as at best an unnecessary diversion or at worst as a thinly disguised expression of misanthropy. |
| Additional Information |
| BISAC Categories: - Political Science | History & Theory - General - Philosophy | Ethics & Moral Philosophy |
| Dewey: 179.1 |
| LCCN: 2002067180 |
| Physical Information: 0.68" H x 6.12" W x 9.46" (1.00 lbs) 228 pages |
| Descriptions, Reviews, Etc. |
| Publisher Description: Why should any society take the decision to devote scarce resources, as a matter of public policy, to preserving natural objects? This is one of the questions considered in the field of environmental ethics, and the thinking that has taken place in this discipline has been dominated by the 'ecocentric-anthropocentric' distinction. Answers focus on either 'intrinsic values in nature', or on the human welfare benefits that will accrue from preservationist policies. These two answers are generally taken to be both mutually exclusive and collectively exhaustive. Ecocentric writers believe that their preferred environmental ethic transcends anthropocentrism, whilst those who cleave to a more 'ecological humanist' position, view the turn to ecocentrism as at best an unnecessary diversion or at worst as a thinly disguised expression of misanthropy. |