Limit this search to....

Attack Politics: Negativity in Presidential Campaigns Since 1960 Revised Edition
Contributor(s): Buell, Emmett H. (Author), Sigelman, Lee (Author)
ISBN: 0700616802     ISBN-13: 9780700616800
Publisher: University Press of Kansas
OUR PRICE:   $29.65  
Product Type: Paperback
Published: September 2009
Qty:
Temporarily out of stock - Will ship within 2 to 5 weeks
Additional Information
BISAC Categories:
- Political Science | Political Process - Campaigns & Elections
- Political Science | American Government - Executive Branch
- History | United States - 20th Century
Dewey: 324.709
LCCN: 2009020147
Series: Studies in Government & Public Policy
Physical Information: 1" H x 6.1" W x 8.9" (1.35 lbs) 400 pages
Themes:
- Chronological Period - 20th Century
 
Descriptions, Reviews, Etc.
Publisher Description:
This second edition of Attack Politics updates Emmett Buell and Lee Sigelman's highly regarded study of negativity in presidential campaigns since 1960 with a substantial new chapter on the 2008 contest between Barack Obama and John McCain. That campaign, the authors contend, proved to be the least negative in the last half century and reinforces their central argument that these campaigns have actually not grown dirtier and more negative since the election of JFK.

In this new edition, Buell and Sigelman address the same questions that guided their research in the original book. Who attacked whom? How frequently? On what issues? In what ways? And at what point in the race? They also update their analysis of whether presidential campaigns have gotten more negative since 1960, whether opposing sides addressed the same issues or avoided subjects owned by the other side, and whether trailing candidates wage more negative campaigns than leading candidates.

The authors expand their analysis well beyond their original research base--17,000 campaign statements extracted from nearly 11,000 news items in the New York Times-focusing on both presidential and vice-presidential nominees as sources and targets of attacks and examining the actions of surrogate campaigners. They also compare their findings with previously published accounts of these campaigns--including firsthand accounts by candidates and their confidants. Each chapter features echoes from the campaign trail that reflect the invective exchanged by rival campaigns.

Their new chapter shows that, rather than neatly resembling either of their typology's extremes (runaways or dead heats), the 2008 race began as a dead heat in late summer but began to take on all the characteristics of a somewhat competitive affair by the end of September. Campaign discourse that began with an anticipated focus on the Iraq War and other national security issues came to be dominated by concerns about the economic meltdown. As the campaign headed toward the home stretch, anxiety about the economy seemed to eclipse national security, health care, immigration, and other concerns. This shift of emphasis, they argue, doomed whatever chance McCain had of winning.

Like the first edition, this update of Attack Politics systematically analyzes negative campaigning, pinning down much that has previously been speculated on but left unsubstantiated. It offers the best overview yet of modern presidential races and remains must reading for anyone interested in the vagaries of those campaigns.