| The Worker: Dominion and Form Contributor(s): Jünger, Ernst (Author), Hemming, Laurence Paul (Editor), Costea, Bogdan (Translator) |
|
 |
ISBN: 081013618X ISBN-13: 9780810136182 Publisher: Northwestern University Press OUR PRICE: $98.95 Product Type: Hardcover Published: November 2017 |
| Additional Information |
| BISAC Categories: - Philosophy | Political - Political Science | Political Ideologies - Conservatism & Liberalism - Political Science | Labor & Industrial Relations |
| Dewey: 331.8 |
| LCCN: 2017022828 |
| Physical Information: 0.7" H x 6.2" W x 9" (1.00 lbs) 232 pages |
| Descriptions, Reviews, Etc. |
| Publisher Description: Written in 1932, just before the fall of the Weimar Republic and on the eve of the Nazi accession to power, Ernst J nger's The Worker: Dominion and Form articulates a trenchant critique of bourgeois liberalism and seeks to identify the form characteristic of the modern age. J nger's analyses, written in critical dialogue with Marx, are inspired by a profound intuition of the movement of history and an insightful interpretation of Nietzsche's philosophy. Martin Heidegger considered J nger "the only genuine follower of Nietzsche," singularly providing "an interpretation which took shape in the domain of that metaphysics which already determines our epoch, even against our knowledge; this metaphysics is Nietzsche's doctrine of the 'will to power.'" In The Worker, J nger examines some of the defining questions of that epoch: the nature of individuality, society, and the state; morality, justice, and law; and the relationships between freedom and power and between technology and nature. This work, appearing in its entirety in English translation for the first time, is an important contribution to debates on work, technology, and politics by one of the most controversial German intellectuals of the twentieth century. Not merely of historical interest, The Worker carries a vital message for contemporary debates about world economy, political stability, and equality in our own age, one marked by unsettling parallels to the 1930s. |