Limit this search to....

Multifactorial Analysis in Corpus Linguistics Revised Edition
Contributor(s): Gries, Stefan Thomas (Author)
ISBN: 0826476066     ISBN-13: 9780826476067
Publisher: Continuum
OUR PRICE:   $133.65  
Product Type: Paperback - Other Formats
Published: April 2005
Qty:
Annotation: This book presents a novel analysis of Particle Movement from the point of view of psycholinguistics. As well as examining the methodology of Particle Movement, the study addresses more theoretical questions. It is argued that some theories of how language is produced by the brain cannot explain the results found in practical studies, and Gries therefore looks at the relative merits of more interactive models of language production. This book will be useful to postgraduates and academics researching cognitive linguistics and psycholinguistics.
Additional Information
BISAC Categories:
- Language Arts & Disciplines | Linguistics - General
Dewey: 418.221
Series: Open Linguistics (Paperback)
Physical Information: 0.72" H x 6.5" W x 9.06" (0.81 lbs) 240 pages
 
Descriptions, Reviews, Etc.
Publisher Description:

This book presents a novel analysis of the word-order alternation of English transitive phrasal verbs (Particle Movement) from a cognitive-functional and psycholinguistic perspective. Its main objective, however, is a methodological one, namely, to demonstrate the superiority of corpus-based, multifactorial and probabilistic approaches to grammatical phenomena over traditional analyses based on acceptability judgements and minimal pair tests. The advantages resulting from the advocated multifactorial approach to Particle Movement are: Particle Movement can be described at a previously unknown level of detail; all determinants ever proposed to govern the alternation can be integrated into a single hypothesis explaining the alternation; constructions can be compared to each other with respect to their degree of prototypicality and similarity; it is possible to actually predict with a high degree of accuracy which of the two word orders native speakers will subconsciously choose in the natural production of speech and text (thereby passing the most rigorous test conceivable); finally, competing hypotheses can be compared in terms of their predictive power.

Apart from these methodological points, the study also addresses the more theoretical and linguistic question of how to explain such results. It is argued that theories of language production that rest on the notion of processing effort are, contrary to some contemporary analysts, not ideally suited to explain such phenomena and that interactive activation models of language production allow for a more elegant interpretation and implementation of the results.