| Reconstructing Rights: Courts, Parties, and Equality Rights in India, South Africa, and the United States Contributor(s): Stohler, Stephan (Author) |
|
 |
ISBN: 1108493181 ISBN-13: 9781108493185 Publisher: Cambridge University Press OUR PRICE: $123.50 Product Type: Hardcover - Other Formats Published: September 2019 |
| Additional Information |
| BISAC Categories: - Law | Constitutional - Law | Civil Rights |
| Dewey: 342.085 |
| LCCN: 2019008055 |
| Series: Comparative Constitutional Law and Policy |
| Physical Information: 0.8" H x 6.1" W x 9" (1.20 lbs) 280 pages |
| Descriptions, Reviews, Etc. |
| Publisher Description: Judges often behave in surprising ways when they re-interpret laws and constitutions. Contrary to existing expectations, judges regularly abandon their own established interpretations in favor of new understandings. In Reconstructing Rights, Stephan Stohler offers a new theory of judicial behavior which demonstrates that judges do not act alone. Instead, Stohler shows that judges work in a deliberative fashion with aligned partisans in the elected branches to articulate evolving interpretations of major statutes and constitutions. Reconstructing Rights draws on legislative debates, legal briefs, and hundreds of judicial opinions issued from high courts in India, South Africa, and the United States in the area of discrimination and affirmative action. These materials demonstrate judges' willingness to provide interpretative leadership. But they also demonstrate how judges relinquish their leadership roles when their aligned counterparts disagree. This pattern of behavior indicates that judges do not exercise exclusive authority over constitutional interpretation. Rather, that task is subject to greater democratic influence than is often acknowledged. |
Contributor Bio(s): Stohler, Stephan: - Stephan Stohler is an Assistant Professor at State University of New York, Albany. His research and teaching interests are in the areas of public law and comparative politics, with a particular focus on the politics of constitutional interpretation. |
