| Autobiographical Memory and the Validity of Retrospective Reports Softcover Repri Edition Contributor(s): Schwarz, Norbert (Editor), Sudman, Seymour (Editor) |
|
 |
ISBN: 1461276128 ISBN-13: 9781461276128 Publisher: Springer OUR PRICE: $52.24 Product Type: Paperback - Other Formats Published: September 2011 |
| Additional Information |
| BISAC Categories: - Self-help | Personal Growth - Memory Improvement - Medical - Psychology | Cognitive Psychology & Cognition |
| Dewey: 153.12 |
| Physical Information: 0.79" H x 6.14" W x 9.21" (1.18 lbs) 360 pages |
| Descriptions, Reviews, Etc. |
| Publisher Description: Autobiographical Memory and the Validity of Retrospective Reports presents the collaborative efforts of cognitive psychologists and research methodologists in the area of autobiographical memory. The editors have included an esteemed group of researchers whose work covers a wide range of issues related to autobiographical memory and the validity of retrospective reports, reflecting the diverse traditions in cognitive psychology and survey research. The first part of the book provides different theoretical perspectives on retrospective reports, along with supporting experimental evidence. The second part of this volume focuses specifically on retrospective reports of behaviors, including recall of the frequency and intensity of physical pain, of the number of cigarettes smoked, of dietary habits, and of child support payments. The following sections address the cognitive processes involved in event dating and time estimation, and a discussion of the differences between self and proxy reports. The final part extends the discussion of autobiographical memories in different directions, including the impact of autobiographical memories on individuals' assessment of their current life, the assessment of social change on the basis of retrospective reports, and the issue of collective memories. This book, an indispensable and timely resource for researchers and students of cognitive psychology as well as to survey methodologists and statisticians, demonstrates the considerable progress made in understanding the cognitive dynamics of retrospective reports. |