| Our President's Mission to Asia: Executive Intelligence Review; Volume 44, Issue 44 Contributor(s): Larouche Jr, Lyndon H. (Author) |
|
 |
ISBN: 1979444544 ISBN-13: 9781979444545 Publisher: Createspace Independent Publishing Platform OUR PRICE: $9.50 Product Type: Paperback Published: November 2017 |
| Additional Information |
| BISAC Categories: - Political Science | International Relations - General |
| Physical Information: 0.12" H x 8.5" W x 11" (0.34 lbs) 56 pages |
| Descriptions, Reviews, Etc. |
| Publisher Description: Oct. 28-There is some very good news: The presidents of the three most important nuclear powers in the world are working intensively to improve relations among their countries and put them on a solid foundation of cooperation in their mutual interest. One might think that these developments would be enthusiastically commented upon in Europe, since they mean that the danger of a major war-one that could possibly exterminate all mankind-may thereby be averted. But far from it Instead, these days the three presidents have one thing in common: They are equally maligned by the mainstream media-although with different predicates-as terrifying bogeymen, various called mentally unstable, a new Stalin, a dictator. This distorted view comes from wearing geopolitical glasses. Less than two weeks before his trip to Asia-when he will visit Japan, South Korea, the Philippines, and Vietnam, and make a two-day state visit to China-President Trump stressed, in an interview with Lou Dobbs on the Fox News television channel, that it would be great if the United States had a good relationship with the nuclear power Russia, and that this would make a solution to the North Korean crisis much easier. Trump, who was supposed to have been intimidated by the intelligence community's concocted fable of "Russia-gate" on precisely this issue, stressed: "If we had a good] relationship with Russia, that would be a good thing, not a bad thing." Trump also reported that he had telephoned President Xi Jinping and congratulated him on his re-election as General Secretary of the Chinese Communist Party: "He's a powerful man. I happen to think he's a very good person. Now with that being said, he represents China, I represent the USA, so, you know, there's going to always be conflict. But we have a very good relationship. People say we have the best relationship of any president-president, because he's called president also." Trump added that he hoped his upcoming trip to Asia would be historic and very positive. There is legitimate hope for such a result in light of the new era, which was been further consolidated by China at the just concluded 19th Congress of the Chinese Communist Party. For, largely ignored or misunderstood by western commentators, President Xi Jinping, in the various aspects of his foreign policy in particular, has laid the groundwork for a new model of international relations, one of "the community of a shared future for mankind," and China is ready to take global responsibility for its success. This concept has been ignored in the western media; instead, these media have chosen to focus on the fact that Xi designated no apparent successor, although that was of minor importance given his re-election for a five-year term. One is reminded of the valet whom Hegel mentions in his Phenomenology of Mind, who only sees the underwear of the world-historical individual he serves, but never the ideas that inspire his master. Obviously the people in the media simply assign the concept of "the community of a common destiny" to the category of propaganda, as they would the usual language with which western parties stress their commitment to "democracy, a free market economy, and human rights"-it belongs to the party litany, but is really only empty phrases. But this is not the case for Xi Jinping and the Chinese Communist Party, which has put itself fully and totally behind Xi Jinping's philosophy of this global community of common destiny. The real objective of the New Silk Road policy is precisely to create a higher level of reason wherein mutually beneficial economic cooperation, "win-win cooperation," overcomes geopolitics, and puts the interests of mankind as a whole before the interests of any single nation or alliance of nations. |
