| Resolution of Disputes Between Foreign Banks and Chinese Sovereign Borrowers, Public and Private International Law Aspects Contributor(s): Yiming Shen (Author) |
|
 |
ISBN: 9041197893 ISBN-13: 9789041197894 Publisher: Kluwer Law International OUR PRICE: $204.93 Product Type: Hardcover - Other Formats Published: January 2000 |
| Additional Information |
| BISAC Categories: - Law | Banking - Law | International |
| Dewey: 341 |
| LCCN: 2002276788 |
| Series: Studies in Comparative Corporate and Financial Law |
| Physical Information: 0.63" H x 6.14" W x 9.21" (1.19 lbs) 240 pages |
| Descriptions, Reviews, Etc. |
| Publisher Description: In recent years the People's Republic of China has experienced rapid economic growth, brought about in large measure by dramatic increases in foreign trade and investment. China's adoption of an open door' policy in the late 1970s also opened up its banking market to foreigners. As a result, there has been a sharp rise in the number of disputes between Chinese sovereign borrowers and foreign banks, making the availability of appropriate dispute resolution mechanisms for foreign banks a critical factor in the expansion of international finance in China. This book recognizes the need for a unique international dispute forum that addresses intricate political and diplomatic considerations and issues of state sovereignty, issues that typically arise from disputes regarding state contracts between national governments and private foreign parties. The work addresses several problematic private and public international law issues in sovereign debt litigation, including: the state immunity theory the act of state doctrine forum non conveniens the difficulty in enforcing foreign judgments It offers a comprehensive survey of the many choices open to a foreign bank operator in planning a dispute resolution strategy in China, analyzing the strengths and weaknesses of each process, and examining a series of case studies by way of illustration. The author argues that the autonomy of each party in international arbitration circumvents potential cultural and conceptual difficulties and offers a flexible, mutually acceptable means of conflict resolution which in some circumstances can prove more effective than litigation. Arbitration and the recognition and enforcement of an arbitral award may be recognized as providing a level playing field for international financial transactions between states and foreign private parties, and the non-adversarial nature of the arbitration process makes it particularly appropriate in the Chinese context. |