Limit this search to....

Henrici de Gandavo Quodlibet VII
Contributor(s): Wilson, G. (Editor)
ISBN: 9061864488     ISBN-13: 9789061864486
Publisher: Leuven University Press
OUR PRICE:   $98.01  
Product Type: Hardcover - Other Formats
Published: February 1991
Qty:
Temporarily out of stock - Will ship within 2 to 5 weeks
Additional Information
BISAC Categories:
- Religion | Theology
- Philosophy | History & Surveys - Medieval
- History | Europe - Medieval
Dewey: 230
Series: Ancient and Medieval Philosophy-Series 2
Physical Information: 1.24" H x 6.59" W x 9.77" (1.74 lbs) 342 pages
Themes:
- Chronological Period - Ancient (To 499 A.D.)
- Chronological Period - Medieval (500-1453)
- Religious Orientation - Christian
 
Descriptions, Reviews, Etc.
Publisher Description:

The editon of Henry of Ghent's Quodlibet VII makes available the critical text of an influential work. Written near the end of 1282, this Quodlibet is perhaps best known because it contains Henry's initial discussion of the papal bull Ad fructus uberes, which had granted certain exaggerated privileges to the mendicants. Henry's text puts forward arguments which limit wide interpretations of the bull and sets forth a position which favors the secular clergy. These arguments set the stage for discussions of the privileges granted by the papal bull. Indeed, Richard of Mediavilla in his Quaestio Privilegii Papae Martini makes a case for the mendicants by addressing the arguments of Quodlibet VII point by point. Henry himself reiterates and elaborates his arguments in subsequent Quodlibeta and in the Tractatus super facto praelatorum et fratrum. His analyses of Ad fructus uberes leads to discussions of poverty in the religious life, which Henry argues is not a perfection but a means to perfection.

Quodlibet VII also treats more philosophical matters, e.g. transcendentals, God's essence and knowledge, knowledge of the divine essence, genus, difference, matter, relation, quantity, human knowledge, and the human body. In addition, the text contains a response to some claims in Berthaud of Saint Denis' Quodlibet I, q17. This fellow secular master has not been studied or edited, but he emerges here and in the Tractatus as a secular master with whom Henry disagreed.